Skip to main content

CESC Ltd

STALWARTNONE
UtilitiesBSE: 500084NSE: CESC
Final Score
15/100
Geometric mean of 5 dimension scores
ClassificationAG4
STRONG AVOID
Overall Rank
#185
Sector Rank
#9
Utilities

Investment Thesis

Despite exhibiting strong governance and a history of consistent dividends, CESC Ltd presents an unacceptable investment case due to critical financial distress signals that override all positive fundamentals. The Altman Z-Score of 0.47 places the company in the bankruptcy zone, while a Debt-to-Equity ratio of 1.48 and meager interest coverage of 1.9x leave no margin for error against rising rates or revenue stagnation. As a 'Stalwart', the company fails its core mandate by displaying collapsing ROE (7%), shrinking owner earnings, and a debt repayment timeline of over 7 years, making it a classic value trap rather than a steady compounder.

3 catalysts3 risksConviction: NONEHorizon: 2y
— Disqualified
Price-to-Earnings Ratioi
13.8×
▲ vs sector 19×
Return on Capital Employedi
11.2%
≈ sector 11.7%
Return on Equityi
11.3%
≈ sector 12%
Piotroski F-Scorei
—
Market Capitalizationi
₹20.2K Cr
▲ vs sector ₹1.6K Cr
Dividend Yieldi
3.9%
▲ vs sector 0%
DISQUALIFIED
— Altman Z-Score 0.47 (distress zone, bankruptcy risk)

Catalysts

  • +Consistent Dividends: Paid dividends every year for 10 years with a current yield of 3.9%.
  • +Cash Flow Generation: Operating Cash Flow remains positive and generally higher than reported Net Profit, suggesting accounting profits are backed by real cash.
  • +Promoter Alignment: Promoters hold 52.11% stake with no pledging, indicating skin in the game.

Risks

  • −Leverage Insolvency Risk — Altman Z-Score of 0.47 places company in distress zone; D/E ratio of 1.48 and Interest Coverage of 1.9x are critically low.
  • −Debt Servicing Sustainability — Debt Repayment Timeline is 7.3 years (threshold < 3yr), indicating debt load is unsustainable relative to Operating Cash Flow.
  • −Tail risk: A sector-wide regulatory shift or 2-year revenue stagnation triggers a liquidity crisis where interest payments consume >50% of OCF, forcing asset fire sales or equity dilution at distressed valuations, potentially leading to technical default or restructuring under IBC.

Key Items to Monitor

  • →Altman Z-Score trajectory: Any further decline below 0.5 increases immediate default probability.
  • →Interest Coverage Ratio: Must remain above 2.5x; a drop below 1.5x would trigger covenant breaches.
  • →Operating Cash Flow vs. Debt Servicing: Monitor if OCF remains sufficient to cover principal + interest without asset fire sales.
  • →Regulatory Environment: Watch for changes in power tariffs that could impact EBITDA margins.

Detail